MJ’s Kids in Danger? Sh’mon Now!
4 Mar
This “news” story was so incredibly sensationalized that I had to weigh in on it, if only to make sense of it all in my own mind. All day yesterday, gossip sites, online (so-called) news magazines and bloggers far and wide were all chomping at the bit about reports from “reliable sources” that there was contention amongst the Jackson cousins; so much so that it led to an attempted taser attack on the late King of Pop’s youngest child, Prince Michael II aka Blanket.
Some sites proposed that Jermaine’s children were “jealous” of the newest arrivals at the Jackson Compound; arrivals who have been monopolizing much of Grandma Katherine’s attention while she’s been assisting them back to a sense of normalcy after their father’s recent passing. Other outlets were saying that in a page from the “kids will be kids” file, one of the Jackson cousins got his mischievous little hands on a taser gun, only to have it confiscated by family security. Yet, even more sites were promoting the tale that not only had one of the cousins ordered a taser gun online, but had actually pointed it at Blanket and was stopped short of firing the device by security personnel.
Good grief! That’s more adolescent drama than an after-school special! But I do have to pose the question since all these gossip-mongers put it out there…what really did happen?
According to statements from Jackson Family attorney Adam Streisand, Michael’s children were never exposed to the weapon. He explained that Jermaine Jackson’s 13 year old son Jafar did in fact order the taser online and opened the package in his bathroom, where he tested the device out on a piece of paper. Once Katherine and security guards heard the sound of the taser gun being used somewhere within the house, it was immediately confiscated. He added that neither Blanket nor Paris Jackson saw or heard the taser gun but that Prince had seen it in the possession of security guards.
Sounds simple enough…although one has to wonder how a 13 year old is able to successfully order and retrieve a taser gun from online (I’m guessing the benefits of a charmed life plus a bit of laxity in parental supervision, eh?).
So where is the smoking (stun) gun here? How does a child testing his boundaries and a couple of adults not overseeing the kids the way they should equate to envious and covetous cousins? Granted, taser guns can be dangerous, and especially so in the hands of a child, but for the media to spin this tale to imply that MJ’s children were somehow being targeted by their own family is ludicrous. And here’s the other “gotcha” that I couldn’t quite wrap my head around. Why did almost all of the news coverage about this issue revolve solely around the safety of Paris, Prince and Blanket? Aren’t their other children living in the home? And if there was a 13 year old pointing a taser gun all willy-nilly, would not their lives be at risk as well? Sorry folks, this is a red herring if ever there was one!
If anything, with young Jafar (and shame on Jermaine, the kid never had a chance) so easily able to gain access to the taser, Joe Jackson should have doled out a tail-whoopin’ good and proper to both father and son for being reckless and making the family look (even more) unstable. Had Papa Joe been more concerned with being the disciplinarian of his household instead of 1) chasing around some young tail and 2) regularly petitioning the attorney’s of Michael’s estate to “up” his monthly allowance, surely none of this would have happened!
I swear, folks sure are making it hard for MJ to rest in PEACE!
Friday Night Olympics & This Awesome BBP App!
27 FebNo, my bedroom wasn’t fire bombed, that’s the Olympic Flame, courtesy of my Blackberry’s itsy bitsy pixeled camera. And, before you ask: Blogging By Phone.
So, seeing as how I am enjoying the dizzying effects of men’s Short Track Speed Skating, the roulette-ish danger of Bobsledding and the death-wish thrills of Alpine Downhill Skiing (all from the comfort of my own home thank you kindly), I figured that instead of not blogging all together, I’d try out this app and see if it really does allow me to post a piece from my phone.
How does it look? Should I just stick to my daily rantings via my desktop or laptop? Or is it seamless enough that I can blog now from anywhere??? Which would be excellent, because I’ve always wanted to on-the-spot rant in Walmart about that horrible cashier/bagger that ALWAYS puts my eggs in with the three pound bag of apples. ALWAYS!
Anyway, no more stalling, I’m about to press “Publish”. I won’t be able to see the full results until morning, so here’s hoping!
A Double-Minded Soft Drink Company Is Unstable In All Of Its Ways…
25 FebBook of Beverages Chapter: 1, Verse: 8
For those with National Pan-Hellenic Council ties or for those who simply enjoy exciting little rarities in popular culture, last weekend’s National Sprite Step-Off in Atlanta, GA had all the components of a competition truly laced in shock and awe.
Almost a week later, after thousands had watched the University of Arkansas’ Zeta Tau Alpha sorority’s show-stopping first place finish, word from the competition’s sponsor (Coca-Cola Company, parent company of Sprite) must have seemed more like a plot right out of the next big Bring It On (and on and on) slash Stomp The Yard (even HARDER) movie hybrid, than the new results of a legitimate contest.
Zeta Tau Alpha Sorority learned with the rest of the world that after discovering a scoring discrepancy in the sorority stepping results, competition officials at Sprite determined that the Tau chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. from Indiana University (who placed 2nd at the event) would be named as co-winner and be awarded an identical $100,000 prize to the one that the ladies of ZTA earned as a result of their original competition win.
Okay, a few things to note here:
-
ZTA just happens to be a white sorority; a white sorority that performed well in the type of competition with a strong, traditionally black heritage.
-
Sprite’s recognition of this so-called “discrepancy” came only after a few competition attendees alleged that the judges were more surprised and impressed that a white sorority could actually “step” rather than judging fairly the sororities that were already presumed able to step.
So…I’ve got to know what someone else thinks. View the women of ZTA and the ladies AKA’s. Regardless of whom you think should have won the women’s portion of the Sprite Step-off Competition, what of Sprite/Coke’s whole “do-over” stance? Were they so afraid of the a potential beverage boycott at the next Johnson’s or Jenkins’ or Smith’s Family Reunion that they thought it better to say “my bad” now than see the corresponding results in their 3rd Quarter Sales? Oh, and what was that little discrepancy that caused this entire hubbub anyway?
Carbonation-deprived minds want to know.